High potential for fraud.

Type discrimination

0.076 bits

Mean agreement

31%

Types

Highest:
SEE+60%
Lowest:
EII+12%
ILE
+14%
ESE
+23%
SEI
+27%
LII
+16%
EIE
+43%
SLE
+44%
LSI
+38%
IEI
+42%
SEE
+60%
LIE
+38%
ILI
+52%
ESI
+17%
LSE
+18%
IEE
+40%
EII
+12%
SLI
+14%

Functions

Strongest:
Ni+2.72
Weakest:
Si-1.99
Ni
+2.72
Ne
-1.20
Si
-1.99
Se
+2.70
Ti
-1.32
Te
-0.56
Fi
-0.46
Fe
+0.10
Qi
-1.39
Qe
-0.63
Di
-0.02
De
+0.54

Quadras

α
-0.75
β
+0.72
γ
+0.72
δ
-0.68

Clubs

NT
-0.08
ST
-0.18
NF
+0.21
SF
+0.04

Big 5

O
+0.12
C
-0.03
E
+0.37
A
-0.84
N
-0.47
Classic names

Dimensions

Strongest:
Antagonism0.72
Second:
Perceiving0.37

Small Groups

Top 3

Top Groups

1

Operational Style:
Scheming

15

1.24
2

Social Interaction:
Confrontational

5

1.02
3

Primal Role:
Victim

10

0.85

1

Social Interaction:
Peaceful

5

-0.94
2

Operational Style:
Stewarding

15

-0.94
3

Actualization Style:
Creating

14

-1.06

Psychopathology

HiTOP

General factor (p)

+1.0583th pct

Superspectra

EmD
-0.90
Psy
+0.44
Ext
+1.92

Spectra

Somatoform
-0.94
Internalizing
-0.85
Thought Disorder
+0.18
Detachment
+0.44
Disinhibited Ext.
+1.09
Antagonistic Ext.
+1.98

Intercorrelations

nearest items
Sections