I don't like fussing with minor details, so I usually try to fit them into some general rule, even if they don't fit very well.

Type discrimination

0.044 bits

Mean agreement

46%

Types

Highest:
LIE+60%
Lowest:
ILI+20%
ILE
+42%
ESE
+25%
SEI
+55%
LII
+57%
EIE
+59%
SLE
+57%
LSI
+36%
IEI
+59%
SEE
+46%
LIE
+60%
ILI
+20%
ESI
+43%
LSE
+31%
IEE
+49%
EII
+46%
SLI
+44%

Functions

Strongest:
Ni+1.29
Weakest:
Te-1.52
Ni
+1.29
Ne
+0.65
Si
-1.38
Se
-0.09
Ti
+0.20
Te
-1.52
Fi
-0.29
Fe
+1.15
Qi
-0.01
Qe
+0.87
Di
-0.01
De
-1.17

Quadras

α
-0.07
β
+0.60
γ
-0.27
δ
-0.25

Clubs

NT
-0.07
ST
-0.29
NF
+0.64
SF
-0.27

Big 5

O
+0.24
C
-0.33
E
+0.22
A
+0.07
N
-0.09
Classic names

Dimensions

Strongest:
Gist0.62
Second:
Satisficing0.31

Small Groups

Top 3

Top Groups

1

Cognitive Harmonics:
Ideals

21

0.95
2

Perceptual Style:
Prospective

9

0.82
3

Social Interaction:
Confrontational

5

0.82

1

Social Interaction:
Communicative

5

-0.73
2

Cognitive Harmonics:
Imprints

21

-0.81
3

Perceptual Style:
Punctilious

9

-0.98

Psychopathology

HiTOP

General factor (p)

+0.2358th pct

Superspectra

EmD
-0.12
Psy
-0.33
Ext
+0.67

Spectra

Somatoform
-0.15
Internalizing
-0.09
Thought Disorder
-0.03
Detachment
-0.41
Disinhibited Ext.
+1.01
Antagonistic Ext.
+0.14

Intercorrelations

nearest items
Sections