My trouble is that I absolutely cannot be insincere.

Type discrimination

0.046 bits

Mean agreement

55%

Types

Highest:
SLI+75%
Lowest:
IEI+37%
ILE
+65%
ESE
+68%
SEI
+57%
LII
+73%
EIE
+42%
SLE
+56%
LSI
+55%
IEI
+37%
SEE
+39%
LIE
+39%
ILI
+38%
ESI
+57%
LSE
+66%
IEE
+47%
EII
+59%
SLI
+75%

Functions

Strongest:
Si+2.97
Weakest:
Ni-3.64
Ni
-3.64
Ne
+0.77
Si
+2.97
Se
-1.45
Ti
+2.04
Te
+0.47
Fi
-0.78
Fe
-0.37
Qi
+1.03
Qe
+0.48
Di
+0.01
De
-0.61

Quadras

α
+0.90
β
-0.57
γ
-0.91
δ
+0.58

Clubs

NT
-0.07
ST
+0.68
NF
-0.67
SF
+0.06

Big 5

O
-0.30
C
+0.16
E
-0.29
A
+0.41
N
+0.21
Classic names

Dimensions

Strongest:
Mutualism0.74
Second:
Sensing0.37

Small Groups

Top 3

Top Groups

1

Actualization Style:
Creating

14

1.22
2

Primal Role:
Curator

10

0.96
3

Operational Style:
Stewarding

15

0.96

1

Quadra:
Gamma

20

-0.91
2

Operational Style:
Scheming

15

-0.97
3

Primal Role:
Victim

10

-1.25

Psychopathology

HiTOP

General factor (p)

-1.429th pct

Superspectra

EmD
+0.02
Psy
-0.66
Ext
-1.43

Spectra

Somatoform
+0.17
Internalizing
-0.07
Thought Disorder
-0.86
Detachment
-0.25
Disinhibited Ext.
-0.88
Antagonistic Ext.
-1.41

Intercorrelations

nearest items
Sections