I tend to view all problems from a global perspective.

Type discrimination

0.063 bits

Mean agreement

63%

Types

Highest:
LII+95%
Lowest:
SEI+45%
ILE
+87%
ESE
+54%
SEI
+45%
LII
+95%
EIE
+79%
SLE
+64%
LSI
+56%
IEI
+61%
SEE
+54%
LIE
+59%
ILI
+72%
ESI
+61%
LSE
+59%
IEE
+57%
EII
+66%
SLI
+46%

Functions

Strongest:
Ti+2.36
Weakest:
Si-2.54
Ni
+1.23
Ne
+2.02
Si
-2.54
Se
-1.92
Ti
+2.36
Te
-0.04
Fi
-1.24
Fe
+0.13
Qi
+1.97
Qe
+0.37
Di
-1.06
De
-0.47

Quadras

α
+0.51
β
+0.12
γ
-0.15
δ
-0.48

Clubs

NT
+1.11
ST
-0.54
NF
+0.17
SF
-0.75

Big 5

O
+0.43
C
-0.04
E
-0.07
A
-0.39
N
+0.14
Classic names

Dimensions

Strongest:
Intuiting0.64
Second:
Reactance0.32

Small Groups

Top 3

Top Groups

1

Economic Role:
Inventor

11

1.28
2

Activity Orientation:
Researcher

8

1.11
3

Primal Role:
Infantile

10

0.96

1

Perceptual Style:
Visceral

9

-0.84
2

Immersed in:
Familiar Order

1

-0.86
3

Primal Role:
Curator

10

-0.93

Psychopathology

HiTOP

General factor (p)

+1.3190th pct

Superspectra

EmD
+0.78
Psy
+1.40
Ext
-0.02

Spectra

Somatoform
+0.53
Internalizing
+0.91
Thought Disorder
+1.63
Detachment
+0.68
Disinhibited Ext.
-0.02
Antagonistic Ext.
-0.01

Intercorrelations

nearest items
Sections